🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions about the remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player in the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the continued absence of US male players at the majors: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is more than justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier between her and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive strength on each forehand and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is often helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the interesting rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of much shorter men. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing slump of US male players lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that exact last eight match should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible service game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing match points in the final game, his first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and never particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {